A corporate network may appear secure – until someone checks whether it truly is.
Many organizations operate under the assumption that if nothing seems wrong, everything must be working fine. However, misconfigurations, open ports, outdated protocols, and lack of segmentation can go unnoticed for months – until something serious happens.
A network security audit helps identify these hidden risks before someone from the outside does. It’s not just a technical review, but a clear diagnosis: what needs to be fixed, what threatens your organization, and where your defenses simply aren’t working.
Table of Contents
Network Security Audit – What Does It Really Mean for Your Organization?
A network security audit is not just a checklist of configurations or a formality to meet policy requirements. It’s a thorough technical and organizational review that uncovers real vulnerabilities – the ones that pose the greatest risk to your organization.
The audit covers multiple layers of IT infrastructure: from network devices (switches, routers, firewalls), to network services (e.g. Active Directory, VPN, web applications), and access controls. It allows for the identification of both technical errors (e.g. default passwords, unpatched systems, open ports) and organizational weaknesses (e.g. poor access control practices, insufficient segmentation, lack of monitoring).
The goal of the audit is to find places where your security doesn’t work. These might be devices that haven’t been updated for years, services exposed to the internet without proper protection, unnecessary network privileges, or excessive permissions for users who no longer need them.
The result is a clear picture of your network's actual condition, along with concrete recommendations: what needs to be fixed, what can wait, and what poses a critical threat. This is essential not only for IT departments but also for management, legal teams, and everyone responsible for organizational security and business continuity.
Dlaczego audyt bezpieczeństwa sieci to coś więcej niż formalność?
Although many companies conduct audits for formal reasons – to meet the requirements of GDPR, DORA, ISO 27001, or internal policies – treating them as a genuine risk management tool brings real benefits. An audit reveals not only what needs improvement, but also where the organization currently stands and what threats may arise if no action is taken. It’s not just a document for the compliance department, but a starting point for informed security management.
A well-executed audit can uncover complex dependencies and risks that are invisible in daily operations – especially in dynamic IT environments, where infrastructure evolves faster than documentation. It’s the depth of analysis and practical conclusions that turn an audit into a tool for real decision-making, not just a formality.
Most Common Vulnerabilities Revealed During a Network Security Audit
Even a well-functioning network can contain serious weaknesses that remain unnoticed during daily operations. A network security audit helps identify these vulnerabilities before they become entry points for attackers. Below are the most frequently recurring issues uncovered during audits conducted by our team.
Misconfiguration of Perimeter Devices
Perimeter devices – such as firewalls, routers, VPN gateways, or UTM systems – form the first line of defense against external threats. A configuration error in these components can expose internal corporate networks without the administrators’ knowledge.
In practice, audits frequently uncover misconfigured firewall rules, overly broad IP address ranges, unrestricted access to administrative panels, or open ports for unused services. It's also common to find disabled event logging or improperly ordered filtering rules, which may allow attackers to bypass security controls.
Such configuration errors are particularly dangerous because users and management are often unaware of them for months. From an attacker’s perspective, this represents a clear opportunity for network scanning, data exfiltration, or remote privilege escalation.
Lack of Network Segmentation
Many organizations still treat their networks as a single flat zone, without dividing them into segments with different trust levels. Lack of segmentation means that if an attacker gains access to one entry point – such as a workstation – they can move laterally throughout the entire environment with ease.
Audits often reveal that employees from administrative departments have technical access to accounting, production, or even server infrastructure, despite having no operational need. This violates the principle of least privilege and significantly increases the attack surface.
The absence of logical and physical zones (e.g., VLANs, DMZs, guest networks) means that even a minor security incident can rapidly escalate and affect the entire organization. Segmentation is not just a technical measure – it's a foundational element of any mature security policy.
Excessive Privileges and Dormant Accounts
One of the most common and dangerous security mistakes in corporate networks is granting users excessive privileges – often “just in case” or without ongoing oversight. As a result, individuals who should only have access to departmental documents can freely browse server resources, customer data, or financial systems.
During audits, we also frequently detect user accounts belonging to former employees that are still active – often with elevated permissions. Combined with the lack of multi-factor authentication or login monitoring, these accounts become prime targets for attackers, especially in the event of password leaks.
Identity and Access Management (IAM) is now one of the critical pillars of mature security. Without regular reviews and automation, organizations face increased risk not only of security incidents but also of legal liability.
Excessive Privileges and Unused Accounts
One of the most common and critical security mistakes in corporate networks is granting users excessive privileges – often "just in case" or without continuous oversight. As a result, individuals who should only have access to departmental documents can freely browse server resources, customer data, or financial systems.
During audits, we frequently identify user accounts belonging to former employees that remain active – often with full administrative rights. Combined with the lack of multi-factor authentication or login activity monitoring, these accounts become an easy target for attackers, especially in the event of credential leaks.
Identity and Access Management (IAM) is now one of the core areas of cybersecurity maturity. The lack of regular access reviews and automation in this area increases not only the risk of incidents, but also the legal liability for the organization.
Exposure of Services to the Internet
Many administrators are unaware that parts of their corporate services are publicly accessible – without authentication, without encryption, and often with default configurations. Network security audits routinely uncover open ports, administrative panels, unsecured databases, or exposed APIs accessible from the Internet.
This type of unintentional exposure typically stems from a lack of environment inventory, NAT misconfigurations, improperly configured firewalls, or test deployments that were never decommissioned. Attackers often don’t need to bypass security controls – simple network scanning is enough to identify exposed entry points.
In financial or regulated environments, this poses not only a technical risk but also a serious compliance violation. Every organization should therefore continuously monitor its external exposure and follow a default deny approach, publishing only what is strictly necessary.
Lack of Updates and Default Passwords
Despite widespread awareness that outdated software poses a serious risk, too many organizations still neglect the process of updating systems and network devices. Audits frequently reveal that routers, switches, operating systems, and business applications are running on outdated versions with well-documented security vulnerabilities.
An even more critical mistake is leaving default passwords active in production systems – both on physical devices and administrative interfaces. These credentials are publicly listed in vendor documentation and are extremely easy for attackers to exploit.
Unpatched systems and weak passwords represent one of the simplest yet most effective attack vectors. Crucially, attackers don't even need to discover them manually – these flaws can be exploited automatically using scripts and off-the-shelf tools. It’s a textbook example of negligence that can cost more than implementing a proper update management system.
Is One Audit Enough? Why Regularity
and Context Are Key
A network security audit is not a one-time project – it’s a critical part of an ongoing process. A single review may provide a valuable diagnosis, but without regular assessments, its relevance quickly fades as your infrastructure evolves.
Networks, users, systems, and threats are in constant flux. New deployments, configuration changes, staff turnover, or software updates can introduce fresh vulnerabilities – even if no critical issues were identified in the previous audit.
Moreover, business context matters greatly. The security posture of a bank will differ from that of a fintech company, or a firm handling healthcare data. Only regular audits tailored to your specific business can deliver an accurate view of risks and provide a sound basis for informed decisions.
That’s why a single audit is only the beginning – not the end – of a robust security journey. Regularity and context are the pillars of resilience. Without them, every assessment becomes a snapshot – not a strategy. If you’re serious about cybersecurity, don’t postpone action. Act now – consciously and systematically.
